LSAT Practice Test

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards

From $12.50Unlock all

Session length

1 / 20

When considering "If jays, martins, or both are in the forest, then so are harriers," which relationship holds true?

J or M implies H or no H implies no J and no M

The correct answer is A because it accurately represents the relationship between jays, martins, and harriers based on the given conditional statement. The statement "If jays, martins, or both are in the forest, then so are harriers" can be translated as: J or M → H. Therefore, if either jays or martins (or both) are in the forest, then harriers must also be present. Option A correctly interprets this relationship by stating that if there are no harriers present, then both jays and martins must also be absent.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

If H then J or M

J and M imply H and no H

If no J or M then no H