What can be inferred from the relationship "not s implies h"?

~s implies h can have both but must have at least one

h implies ~s can have none but not both

s implies not h can have none but not both

In the relationship "not s implies h," if s is not true, then h must be true. This means that if s does not happen, then h is guaranteed to happen. So, the correct inference from this relationship would be "s implies not h," which means if h does not happen, then s must be true. This is why option C is the correct choice.

Option A states "~s implies h can have both but must have at least one," which is not supported by the given relationship. Option B states "h implies ~s can have none but not both," which is not in line with the relationship provided. Option D states "~h implies s can have both but must have at least one," which is not the correct inference based on the relationship given.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

~h implies s can have both but must have at least one

Want more questions?

All options are one-time payments.

$12.99

30 day pass for new members

All the basics to get you started

  • Ad-free experience
  • View your previous attempt history
  • Mobile app access
  • In-depth explanations
  • 30 day premium pass access
$29.99 $92.93 usd

6 month DELUXE pass (most popular)

Everything with the 30 day premium pass FOR 6 MONTHS! & the ultimate digital PDF study guide (BONUS)

  • Everything included in the premium pass
  • $92.93 usd value for $29.99! You save $62.94!
  • + Access to the ultimate digital PDF study guide
  • + 6 months of premium pass access
  • + Priority support
$14.99 $19.99

Ultimate digital PDF study guide

For those that prefer a more traditional form of learning

  • Available for instant download
  • Available offline
  • Hundreds of practice multiple choice questions
  • Comprehensive content
  • Detailed explanations
Image Description
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy