LSAT Practice Test

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the LSAT Practice Test with our comprehensive quiz. Use flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with detailed hints and explanations. Get started now and boost your score!

Practice this question and more.

When in LSAT formal logic is the term "Consequently" used as a signal?

A. Mutually Exclusive
B. Necessity
C. Conclusion
D. Sufficient Condition

The correct answer is: C. Conclusion

In LSAT formal logic, the term "Consequently" is used as a signal to indicate a conclusion. This signifies that the information provided before the term "Consequently" leads to or supports the statement that follows it. Therefore, when you encounter the term "Consequently" in a logical reasoning question, it is signaling that the information preceding it is leading to a conclusion being drawn. The other answer choices are not correct in this context: - "Mutually Exclusive" refers to events that cannot occur simultaneously. - "Necessity" involves something that is required but doesn't specifically address the signal "Consequently." - "Sufficient Condition" refers to a condition that, if met, guarantees the outcome, but it is not the direct signal indicated by "Consequently." Therefore, the correct answer is C. Conclusion.