LSAT Practice Test

Which type of argument involves leveraging fear and extreme hypotheticals without proof?

1. Runaway train

2. School Counselor Professional Standards

3. Loaded words

4. Slippery slope fallacy

The correct answer is: Slippery slope fallacy

A slippery slope fallacy is a type of argument that involves leveraging fear and extreme hypotheticals without actual proof. This type of argument asserts that a relatively small first step will inevitably lead to a chain of events with negative consequences. It often relies on the audience's fear of the hypothetical outcomes rather than providing concrete evidence for the likelihood of those outcomes occurring. In this scenario, the slippery slope fallacy fits the description provided in the question. Option A, the runaway train, does not involve leveraging fear and extreme hypotheticals without proof; it typically involves a moral dilemma around utilitarian principles. Option B, school counselor professional standards, is specific to ethical guidelines for counselors and does not relate to fear or extreme hypotheticals. Option C, loaded words, refers to the use of emotionally charged language to manipulate or sway an audience, and though it may be related to fear, it does not inherently involve extreme hypotheticals without proof. Only option D, the slippery slope fallacy, aligns with the description given in the question.